Posted by: stelladuffy | September 6, 2010

Green Carnations, brickbats/bouquets

Lots of people seem to be all excited about the presence of various books, named authors, lesbians or not, etc etc on the Green Carnation Prize longlist. Sigh. If I had an advance for every time I or a book of mine hasn’t made it on to some purportedly ‘gay’ list, I’d be a wealthy woman.
Other than the Stonewall Award (for The Room of Lost Things, not a partic ‘gay book’ in my opinion, though written by me, and with two gay characters), the only time a book of mine did make it on to a ‘gay’ list was the Big Gay Read, when Calendar Girl came 5= out of 100 or so, in a public vote. What cheered me no end about this was that Calendar Girl was the ONLY book in those top 5 that hadn’t been made into telly. Presumably then, the people voting for it had actually read the book. All good.

Every list will excite some kind of controversy. Personally I’m feeling for the people who’ve created the Green Carnation now, if I were them I might be thinking it’s more hassle than it’s worth. And isn’t that always the way with things for our gay ‘community’, we almost never just say “yep, that’s nice, I’d have chosen this book or that one instead, but well done for doing it anyway, for free and in your own time.”

Could we not just be pleased that ANYONE feels like taking on the onerous task of recognising gay* lit at all, at a time when, according to so many commentators gay lit is being ignored/hidden/silenced? (Though I’m not sure about this myself, the clear indication being that many – all? – of the books on this list are from mainstream publishers, and isn’t that a good thing?)

* Yes, gay = men in this case, but that’s hardly unusual, and I’d suggest to the lesbians complaining that it doesn’t include lesbian novels that er, we could do it ourselves if we wanted?!


Responses

  1. Thanks, Stella. We seem to unleashed a tide of irk with some of our inclusions or otherwise. All I can say is that we chose the books we thought were the best ones.

  2. Thanks, Stella. As one of two female judges for the prize, and straight at that, I’ve been surprised at the amount of controversy we’ve sparked. All I wanted was inclusive, accessible books.

  3. See, there’s the problem right there Paul – you chose the books based on, you know, what was actually in the books.

    No the done thing at all🙂

  4. Well said. There´s been too much ´sour grapes´ by certain people recently. What other award committee have to justify their nominations? Do the Oscars committee have to explain why Toy Story 3 didnºt get nominated for Best Film?

  5. Dear Stella
    Very sorry to be off topic, but I enjoy your blog, and – more importantly – your books.
    I thought I had read most of them, and considered you quite prolific, but imagine my surprise when in today’s Times I read that you’ve actually written 126! In my dreams : ) Given the subject matter of the article, maybe you’ve been writing them in your sleep?
    Yours, tongue firmly in cheek, Gael

  6. heh, I didn’t see that but was told about it. yup, am definitely at my most prolific in my sleep! x


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: